What Indiana, Arkansas religious freedom laws really mean
Go Deeper.
Create an account or log in to save stories.
Like this?
Thanks for liking this story! We have added it to a list of your favorite stories.
In the midst of national criticism on a religious freedom bill in Indiana, Arkansas passed a similar law:
Both states' laws allow for larger corporations, if they are substantially owned by members with strong religious convictions, to claim that a ruling or mandate violates their religious faith, something reserved for individuals or family businesses in other versions of the law. Both allow religious parties to go to court to head off a "likely" state action that they fear will impinge on their beliefs, even if it has not yet happened. Continue reading the main story
The Arkansas act contains another difference in wording, several legal experts said, that could make it harder for the government to override a claim of religious exemption. The state, according to the Arkansas bill, must show that a law or requirement that someone is challenging is "essential" to the furtherance of a compelling governmental interest, a word that is absent from the federal law and those in other states, including Indiana.
On MPR News with Kerri Miller, we discussed what these religious freedom laws say, how they are legally interpreted and what it means in our political landscape.
Turn Up Your Support
MPR News helps you turn down the noise and build shared understanding. Turn up your support for this public resource and keep trusted journalism accessible to all.