St. Paul officials want soccer stadium talks kept in dark
Go Deeper.
Create an account or log in to save stories.
Like this?
Thanks for liking this story! We have added it to a list of your favorite stories.
The city of St. Paul, its economic development arm and the Metropolitan Council are trying to limit disclosure of information related to a potential Major League Soccer stadium.
The three government entities are trying to negotiate a complex deal to build a privately financed stadium on publicly-owned land near the intersection of Interstate 94 and Snelling Avenue.
This week, their governing bodies will each vote on an agreement designed to shield those negotiations from open records laws. The agreement calls for the city, the St. Paul Port Authority and the Met Council to ensure the information they exchange, "remains non-public to the fullest extent of the law."
State law makes most government data public unless the information is specifically classified otherwise. The agreement asserts the negotiations will involve trade secrets, real estate appraisals and applications for "public financial assistance," which are classified as non-public.
Turn Up Your Support
MPR News helps you turn down the noise and build shared understanding. Turn up your support for this public resource and keep trusted journalism accessible to all.
However, experts in the Minnesota Government Data Practices law are skeptical of that argument.
While there may be a small amount of classified information related to stadium negotiations, the vast majority is public under the law, said Don Gemberling, who spent decades analyzing and interpreting the state's data practices law at the Minnesota Department of Administration.
Local governments have no power to simply declare information confidential, in spite of the language in the proposed contract, said Gemberling.
"I think it's drafted that way either because they don't understand the data practices act or they're trying to hide what they're doing," Gemberling said.
"This is as far from transparency as one could get, and it's all based on a bunch a legal gobbledygook," he added. "Members of the City Council and the Metropolitan Council ought to be saying, 'What are we doing here?'"