Trump's 'comic-book' campaign and what would make debates more meaningful
Go Deeper.
Create an account or log in to save stories.
Like this?
Thanks for liking this story! We have added it to a list of your favorite stories.

"Is this a comic-book version of a presidential campaign?" journalist John Harwood asked Donald Trump during CNBC's October GOP debate.
The question is problematic according to Annenberg Public Policy Center director Kathleen Hall Jamison.
"The problem occurs when you ask a question in a way that the respondent can easily duck," Jamison told Kerri Miller. "When you add the snarky coda to the end of a question, the candidate is now given a license with the audience — which are all partisans that is why they are all there — to attack the media or attack the question and not address the substance of the question."
A good primary debate, Jamison said, should teach us two things: 1) What is the boundary of the ideological disagreement and agreement within the party; 2) How does this candidate position within that agreement or disagreement
"The role of a good moderator is to frame the question in a way that invites answers that will enlighten the electorate," Jamison added.
CNN's John King joined the conversation and said most voters don't realize the campaign's role in organizing the debates. "The campaigns negotiate the [debate] rules and then attack them after the fact," he told Miller.
To listen to the full conversation between Kathleen Hall Jamison, John King and Kerri Miller use the audio player above.
Turn Up Your Support
MPR News helps you turn down the noise and build shared understanding. Turn up your support for this public resource and keep trusted journalism accessible to all.