Stay Curious. Stay Connected.
MailNewsletters♡Donate Now
Sign up
*Password must be at least 8 characters and contain one uppercase letter, one lowercase letter, one number and one symbol.
Already have an account?
By submitting, you consent that you are at least 18 years of age and to receive information about MPR's or APMG entities' programs and offerings. The personally identifying information you provide will not be sold, shared, or used for purposes other than to communicate with you about MPR, APMG entities, and its sponsors. You may opt-out at any time clicking the unsubscribe link at the bottom of any email communication. View our Privacy Policy.
Sign in to your profile
Forgot Password?
New to MPR News?
Welcome back
to news
for you
Reset Password

Enter the username on file and we'll send you a code to reset your password.

Still require assistance or not sure what your User Name is?
Welcome back
to news
for you
Email Verification

A verification code has been emailed to

Still awaiting the code?

Judging bias

Go Deeper.

Create an account or log in to save stories.

Like this?

Thanks for liking this story! We have added it to a list of your favorite stories.

[image]

When skaters perform their triple lutzes and sit-spins in Turin, Italy this week, their performances will be judged by a whole new system of scoring. It was put into place after a judging scandal that involved vote trading in Salt Lake four years ago denied a Canadian pair of skaters the gold medal.

The new system is an attempt to make judging less subjective ... and therefore less vulnerable to bias. If a skater does a certain jump, she receives a specific number of points for that.

And yet, one of our guests on Midmorning says bias, whether on the ice or in the boardroom, is not always a negative.