Stay Curious. Stay Connected.
MailNewsletters♡Donate Now
Sign up
*Password must be at least 8 characters and contain one uppercase letter, one lowercase letter, one number and one symbol.
Already have an account?
By submitting, you consent that you are at least 18 years of age and to receive information about MPR's or APMG entities' programs and offerings. The personally identifying information you provide will not be sold, shared, or used for purposes other than to communicate with you about MPR, APMG entities, and its sponsors. You may opt-out at any time clicking the unsubscribe link at the bottom of any email communication. View our Privacy Policy.
Sign in to your profile
Forgot Password?
New to MPR News?
Welcome back
to news
for you
Reset Password

Enter the username on file and we'll send you a code to reset your password.

Still require assistance or not sure what your User Name is?
Welcome back
to news
for you
Email Verification

A verification code has been emailed to

Still awaiting the code?
Brandt Williams
Minneapolis

Minneapolis elections officials finding few errors on ballots

Go Deeper.

Create an account or log in to save stories.

Log inCreate a free Account

Like this?

Thanks for liking this story! We have added it to a list of your favorite stories.

Show me!

Minneapolis city elections officials say so far they have not found more errors on ballots than they usually do.

The city is hand counting the ballots cast last week in the city's first ever election using instant runoff voting. The system allows people to select a first, second and third choice for an office. Interim elections director Pat O'Connor said, so far the counters haven't run into any big snags.

"We're astounded, absolutely astounded," O'Connor said. "We were pleased originally that we could get it all done by December 21, and it appears now that based on our experience that we'll be well ahead of that."

O'Connor said the hand count is going fast primarily because few voters turned out for the election.

"We had originally planned and sequenced the whole thing based on a turnout of 70,000 and 75,000, which was turnout in the past couple of races," he said. "I think eight years ago it was 90,000. Four years ago it was 70,000; so we picked 75,000 to plan around. We were very surprised at 46,000."

O'Connor also says the count has gone faster than expected because so many voters didn't choose more than one candidate and that results for half of the city council races should be completed by the end of this week.