Frigid temperatures this weekend prompt cold weather advisories

MPR News helps you turn down the noise and build shared understanding. Turn up your support for this public resource and keep trusted journalism accessible to all. 

Turn Up Your Support

Michigan asked the U.S. Supreme Court
on Monday to close shipping locks near Chicago to prevent Asian
carp from invading the Great Lakes and endangering their $7 billion
fishery.

      State Attorney General Mike Cox filed a lawsuit Monday with the
nation's highest court against Illinois, the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers and the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of
Greater Chicago. They operate canals and other waterways that open
into Lake Michigan.

      Bighead and silver carp from Asia have been detected in those
waterways after migrating north in the Mississippi and Illinois
rivers for decades.

      Officials poisoned a section of the Chicago Sanitary and Ship
Canal this month to prevent the carp from getting closer to Lake
Michigan while an electrical barrier was taken down for
maintenance.

      But scientists say DNA found north of the barrier suggest at
least some of the carp have gotten through and may be within 6
miles of Lake Michigan. If so, the only other obstacle between them
and the lake are shipping locks, which open frequently to grant
passage for cargo vessels.

      Fifty members of Congress last week joined environmental groups
in urging closure of the locks - the same demand made in Michigan's
lawsuit.

      "The Great Lakes are an irreplaceable resource," Cox, who is
seeking the Republican gubernatorial nomination in Michigan, said
at a news conference in Detroit. "Thousands of jobs are at stake
and we will not get a second chance once the carp enter Lake
Michigan."

      He likened the fish to "nuclear bombs."

      Cox went directly to the Supreme Court because it handles
disputes between states.

      Michigan is seeking to reopen a case dating back more than a
century, when Missouri filed suit after Chicago reversed the flow
of the Chicago River and began sending sewage-fouled Lake Michigan
water south toward the Mississippi River.


      After that issue was resolved, several Great Lakes states -
including Michigan - renewed the suit with a new complaint:
Chicago's diversion of water away from the basin was harming the
lakes by lowering water levels.

      The high court has ruled on the matter numerous times, setting
ceilings on the amount of Lake Michigan water Chicago could divert.
The present limit is 2.1 billion gallons per day.

      Michigan's suit argues that continued operation of the locks
represents another potential injury to the lakes. It asks the court
to immediately order them closed, and to create new barriers to
prevent the carp from entering the ship canal from nearby waterways
during floods.

      Obama administration officials last week pledged $13 million to
prevent carp from bypassing the electronic barrier by migrating
between the Des Plaines River and the canal.

      The lawsuit also asks the Supreme Court to require a study of
the Chicago waterway system to define where and how many carp are
in those waters and to eradicate them.


      Noah Hall, an assistant professor at Wayne State University's
law school, said Michigan has a good chance of prevailing if it can
show the potential harm posed by Asian carp would outweigh the
benefits of keeping the locks open.

      "The carp invasion is a good textbook example of irreparable
harm," Hall said.


      Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan's office was reviewing
the suit and had no immediate comment, spokeswoman Natalie Bauer
said.


      Metropolitan Water Reclamation District spokeswoman Jill Horist
called the lawsuit "unfortunate."

      "It's unfortunate that there would be an assumption that this
would make some positive resolution come sooner than is truly
feasible," Horist said. "Even if the locks were closed there's
still a variety of ways for DNA or Asian carp to enter Lake
Michigan."

      Messages left with the Army Corps of Engineers seeking comment
were not returned.


      Rep. Candice Miller, a Michigan Republican, praised the lawsuit.


      "There is nothing more pressing than stopping this aggressive
invasive species from entering Lake Michigan and threatening our
lake's environment and all the states' economies in the Great Lakes
Basin," Miller said.


      Environmentalists said closing the locks would be a temporary
fix, but the only long-term solution would be restoring the natural
separation between the Great Lakes and the Mississippi River
system.


      "The Chicago diversion was a 19th century solution to an
environmental problem. Now it's causing a 21st century emergency,"
said Andy Buchsbaum, director of the National Wildlife Federation's
Great Lakes center.


      Associated Press Writers Ed White in Detroit and Carla K.
Johnson in Chicago contributed to this story.
      

Gallery

Feds to spend $13M to fight Asian carp invasion

Are all invasive species as bad as the Asian carp?

Mich. AG says he'll sue to protect lakes from carp

Michigan asked the U.S. Supreme Court
on Monday to close shipping locks near Chicago to prevent Asian
carp from invading the Great Lakes and endangering their $7 billion
fishery.


Mich. files suit in US high court over Asian carp

Go Deeper.

Like this?