Gawker: University of Minnesota has 5th highest total student debt load
Go Deeper.
Create an account or log in to save stories.
Like this?
Thanks for liking this story! We have added it to a list of your favorite stories.
swamysk via Flickr
Now why did I go to school?
Turn Up Your Support
MPR News helps you turn down the noise and build shared understanding. Turn up your support for this public resource and keep trusted journalism accessible to all.
From the Take-This-With-a-Grain-of-Salt-Department:
I just got Gawker's Top Ten Universities for Student Debt list forwarded by a colleague.
It's an interesting list, but limited in its usefulness, as it appears to be fairly raw data:
1) New York University: $659 million
2) University of Southern California: $631 million
3) Penn State University: $590 million
4) Ohio State University: $560 million
5) University of Minnesota: $495 million
6) Arizona State University: $479 million
7) University of Texas: $474 million
8) Michigan State University: $433 million
9) Indiana University- Purdue University: $421 million
10) Rutgers: $398 million
It ranked the nonprofit institutions according to total student debt load. As it mentions toward the bottom of the article: Clearly, big schools will have bigger debt loads.
It stops its "number crunching" there, and tells those interested in more illuminating numbers -- per-student debt figures -- to "see the linked source material."
Looking at the Cumulative Four-Year Repayment Rate by Institution section it refers to, I compared the numbers on the Median Federal Debt For Those Entering Repayment column and saw that the U doesn't seem to have such a high rank anymore.
Just this week, US News & World Report released its Debt Load -- Class of 2009 list, and the U of M was nowhere to be found -- not even on the regional rankings. The only Minnesota college that placed was College of St. Scholastica (2nd among Midwest regional universities), which apparently had 81% of its graduates holding debt, the average amount being $40,401.
But I've just been eyeballing the Gawker list, and I'm the last person to claim to know the right methodology.
Does anyone know whether Gawker's list holds water?