Stay Curious. Stay Connected.
MailNewsletters♡Donate Now
Sign up
*Password must be at least 8 characters and contain one uppercase letter, one lowercase letter, one number and one symbol.
Already have an account?
By submitting, you consent that you are at least 18 years of age and to receive information about MPR's or APMG entities' programs and offerings. The personally identifying information you provide will not be sold, shared, or used for purposes other than to communicate with you about MPR, APMG entities, and its sponsors. You may opt-out at any time clicking the unsubscribe link at the bottom of any email communication. View our Privacy Policy.
Sign in to your profile
Forgot Password?
New to MPR News?
Welcome back
to news
for you
Reset Password

Enter the username on file and we'll send you a code to reset your password.

Still require assistance or not sure what your User Name is?
Welcome back
to news
for you
Email Verification

A verification code has been emailed to

Still awaiting the code?
On Campus Blog
Alex Friedrich

U-Minn's National Research Council assessment

Go Deeper.

Create an account or log in to save stories.

Log inCreate a free Account

Like this?

Thanks for liking this story! We have added it to a list of your favorite stories.

Show me!

This is not your usual popular-media college ranking. So those looking for a quick guide to graduate programs can move along.

Today, the National Research Council released its assessment of U.S. doctoral programs covering more than 5,000 programs in 62 fields at 212 universities nationwide. It's supposed to help universities evaluate and improve the quality of their programs.

It's also supposed to provide prospective students with information on the nation's doctoral programs -- and probably takes a doctoral student to interpret the data. (Might perhaps make a good grad school entrance exam, for that matter.)

I've just gotten the results, and don't have the time at this late hour to go over them for interpretation and comparison. And if anyone out there is familiar with this system and would like to take a shot, please help me out.

Here's the University of Minnesota's release of its results, as well as its comments.

The U's Web page on the whole affair is here, the National Research Council's news site -- with a section on the assessment -- is here, and the Chronicle of Higher Education's report on it is here.

Note: The methodology is different from that of the last two reports -- in 1995 and 1983 -- so any comparisons to past performance are supposedly iffy at best.