Stay Curious. Stay Connected.
MailNewsletters♡Donate Now
Sign up
*Password must be at least 8 characters and contain one uppercase letter, one lowercase letter, one number and one symbol.
Already have an account?
By submitting, you consent that you are at least 18 years of age and to receive information about MPR's or APMG entities' programs and offerings. The personally identifying information you provide will not be sold, shared, or used for purposes other than to communicate with you about MPR, APMG entities, and its sponsors. You may opt-out at any time clicking the unsubscribe link at the bottom of any email communication. View our Privacy Policy.
Sign in to your profile
Forgot Password?
New to MPR News?
Welcome back
to news
for you
Reset Password

Enter the username on file and we'll send you a code to reset your password.

Still require assistance or not sure what your User Name is?
Welcome back
to news
for you
Email Verification

A verification code has been emailed to

Still awaiting the code?
On Campus Blog
Alex Friedrich

Paper: Why Eric Kaler's compensation isn't reasonable

Go Deeper.

Create an account or log in to save stories.

Log inCreate a free Account

Like this?

Thanks for liking this story! We have added it to a list of your favorite stories.

Show me!

The Minnesota Daily student paper rebuts the arguments for University of Minnesota President Eric Kaler's compensation -- that his pay in the middle of Big Ten presidential packages and that it's necessary to attract top talent:

... Such a superficial argument deserves a platitude in response: Just because everyone else is doing it doesn’t make it right.

For a little perspective, the President of the United States earns exactly $400,000 a year. That’s hardly a pittance, but also hardly commensurate with the weight of that office’s responsibilities. Why? Because, at least in theory, the president is elected to serve, not to profit.