Stay Curious. Stay Connected.
MailNewsletters♡Donate Now
Sign up
*Password must be at least 8 characters and contain one uppercase letter, one lowercase letter, one number and one symbol.
Already have an account?
By submitting, you consent that you are at least 18 years of age and to receive information about MPR's or APMG entities' programs and offerings. The personally identifying information you provide will not be sold, shared, or used for purposes other than to communicate with you about MPR, APMG entities, and its sponsors. You may opt-out at any time clicking the unsubscribe link at the bottom of any email communication. View our Privacy Policy.
Sign in to your profile
Forgot Password?
New to MPR News?
Welcome back
to news
for you
Reset Password

Enter the username on file and we'll send you a code to reset your password.

Still require assistance or not sure what your User Name is?
Welcome back
to news
for you
Email Verification

A verification code has been emailed to

Still awaiting the code?
Julie Siple
ST. PAUL, Minn.

Report: More children on food stamps

Go Deeper.

Create an account or log in to save stories.

Log inCreate a free Account

Like this?

Thanks for liking this story! We have added it to a list of your favorite stories.

Show me!

More than 500,000 Minnesotans are on food stamps, almost double 2006 numbers, according to an annual report from the Minnesota Department of Human Services. Children represented the fastest growing group in the report.

The report provides a snapshot of the economic and demographic characteristics of Minnesotans on food stamps, officially called the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. The report is based on the food stamp rolls as of last December.

More than 30 percent of food stamp recipients reported having work income. Sixty percent of recipients were white, 25 percent black. Women on food stamps still outnumber men. However, the number of men has risen since the start of the recession to 43 percent of food stamp recipients. About a third of adults on the program were disabled. Fifteen percent were seniors.

The state says the poor economy is the underlying reason for the caseload increases, but eligibility changes also contributed.