Audit finds a few problems with Historical Society Legacy grants
Go Deeper.
Create an account or log in to save stories.
Like this?
Thanks for liking this story! We have added it to a list of your favorite stories.
Some Legacy Amendment grants administered by the Minnesota Historical Society did not follow all policies and procedures, according to an audit released Thursday.
The report by the Minnesota Legislative Auditor said the society's internal controls were generally adequate.
The problems it cited included not ensuring recipients of Legacy grants waited until the grants were fully executed to start work. In one case, a grant recipient started work 119 days before the contract was fully executed.
The audit also found that not all of the larger Legacy grants were peer reviewed, as required by the society's own policy.
Turn Up Your Support
MPR News helps you turn down the noise and build shared understanding. Turn up your support for this public resource and keep trusted journalism accessible to all.
In a letter accompanying the audit report, Minnesota Historical Society Director Stephen Elliott said officials will clarify its policies about when recipients can begin their work.
Elliott said the society's practice is to peer review grants over $100,000, even though its policy is to peer review grants over $50,000. The society will change its policy to peer review grants over $100,000, Elliott said. He noted that the Minnesota Office of Grants Management does not require peer review.
Other audits on the agencies that oversee the Legacy arts funds are expected in the coming months. That includes a report on money Minnesota Public Radio receives.
• Follow Elizabeth Dunbar on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/edunbarmpr