Study: Wolves contribute to moose decline

Gray wolf
A gray wolf rests on the snow an opening in the forest north of Duluth, Minn., on Wednesday, March 13, 2013. A pilot with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources located the wolf from the air after listening to its radio-collar signal. The DNR uses aerial observations to provide data for a wolf population survey in progress this winter.
AP Photo/Duluth News Tribune, Bob King

Researchers using GPS trackers and transmitters to find out what's causing the decline of northeastern Minnesota's moose population are getting some early results that show wolves are to blame for some of the deaths.

State wildlife experts recently tranquilized 111 moose to fit them with high-tech collars that send satellite messages if the animal stops moving for six hours. The goal is to get crews to the dead moose quickly to harvest organs and tissue to find out what killed them.

Six of those moose already have died and at least two appear to be wolf victims, Department of Natural Resources officials told the Duluth News Tribune for a story published Monday. The four others are listed as having died of complications from the stress of being tranquilized and collared.

In a similar study of 19 moose collared by the Grand Portage Band of Chippewa, at least one animal died from a wolf attack.

"This is the time of the year, that we'd expect wolves to have an easier time at taking down their prey, because of the snow on the ground, so it's nothing too surprising for us," Butler said.

Northeastern Minnesota's moose population has plummeted from 8,800 in 2006 to 2,760 this January, prompting the DNR to cancel moose hunting for the foreseeable future. Scientists are trying to determine why they're dying off. They suspect a combination of higher summertime temperatures; parasites such as brain worms and ticks; increased numbers of deer, which carry brain worms; diseases; aging forests that contain less food for moose; and possibly more wolves in the moose range.

The rate of "capture-related mortality" of about 3.6 percent is average for capture-and-collaring projects and is lower than in recent Minnesota moose studies, said Erika Butler, the DNR veterinarian in charge of the project.

"Any moose that dies within two weeks of capture is automatically counted as a capture-related mortality. It may have been something else, but we count it as that," Butler said. "Some animals are weak going into it and just can't get back up. We don't like it, but it happens."

Of the two moose that appeared to be wolf victims in the DNR test, one had been mostly eaten while the other had injuries from a wolf attack but had not been eaten. It appears wolves got the big cow's calf and then left before the cow died, Butler said.

"She died from secondary issues after being wounded by wolves. It was pretty cool how (the crews) went in there and figured out what happened," Butler said.

Both of those adult moose, and even some moose that died from capture-related stress, had low body fat in what has been a fairly normal winter.

"This winter should not have had an impact on moose or even deer," said Seth Moore, a researcher for the Grand Portage Band. "They should be in good shape."

Moore said the moose in his study was already sick.

"It was clear that wolves killed it. The site was just decimated from the struggle ... blood everywhere, trees knocked down. But when we got to looking in the lungs, they were just full of bright-green pneumonia," Moore said.

___

MPR reporter Dan Kraker contributed to this story

Information from: Duluth News Tribune