Stay Curious. Stay Connected.
MailNewsletters♡Donate Now
Sign up
*Password must be at least 8 characters and contain one uppercase letter, one lowercase letter, one number and one symbol.
Already have an account?
By submitting, you consent that you are at least 18 years of age and to receive information about MPR's or APMG entities' programs and offerings. The personally identifying information you provide will not be sold, shared, or used for purposes other than to communicate with you about MPR, APMG entities, and its sponsors. You may opt-out at any time clicking the unsubscribe link at the bottom of any email communication. View our Privacy Policy.
Sign in to your profile
Forgot Password?
New to MPR News?
Welcome back
to news
for you
Reset Password

Enter the username on file and we'll send you a code to reset your password.

Still require assistance or not sure what your User Name is?
Welcome back
to news
for you
Email Verification

A verification code has been emailed to

Still awaiting the code?
Ground Level Blog
Jennifer Vogel

At rural health conference, trepidation about healthcare reform

Go Deeper.

Create an account or log in to save stories.

Log inCreate a free Account

Like this?

Thanks for liking this story! We have added it to a list of your favorite stories.

Show me!

DULUTH, Minn. -- “Stuff is going on right now and it’s getting really aggressive.” That was the message this morning to several hundred Minnesota health-care providers, hospital administrators and medical students from Eric Shell of the consulting firm Stroudwater Associates.

Shell, whose firm is based in Maine, was  the opening speaker at a two-day Minnesota Rural Health Conference here, focused on healthcare reform and access to medical services in rural areas.

Shell painted an urgent portrait of the shifting healthcare landscape, some of the changes stemming from federal healthcare reform and emerging new quality measurement and reimbursement models. The shift is away from fee for services and toward providers working together and being paid based on results.

Minnesota may be better positioned than most states when it comes to dealing with what’s coming because the state has been experimenting with collaborative care for years. Earlier this year, the state received a $45 million federal grant to fund a State Health Care Innovation Plan, which will push forward efforts related to collaboration, lowering costs and improving health outcomes.

But Shell said there are factors that will affect the sustainability of rural hospitals and clinics that have nothing to do with reform, such as more people having high deductible insurance policies. These policies make people reluctant to seek treatment for minor and even major ailments. He cited a recent study that found while 17 percent of employers nationwide offer only high deductible policies today, the projection for 2014 is 44 percent. “That is frightening,” he said, adding that hospitals and clinics will have to fight harder to win patients, who have become “consumers.”

He also suggested that larger health providers, including urban hospitals, will be looking to expand their patient bases and that could mean reaching into rural markets. “They will have to jack up volume,” he said. “They have already been beating themselves to death in the cities.” He said the fact that health care reform will lead to more insured people across the board will make rural areas more attractive. “If I’m a hospital, I’m coming to rural in a big way.”

While that could be good for rural patients, it means some providers need to step up their games to stay competitive. In rural areas, given sparse populations and a lack of doctors and nurses, providers are used to collaborating. That’s a good thing, he said. “You may have to consider a regional alignment… to survive the shaky bridge.” Shell suggested forging strong relationships with providers and patients alike. “We really should understand what’s going on in the market around us.”