Op-ed pick: Wendy Davis shouldn’t be sainted for her filibuster
Go Deeper.
Create an account or log in to save stories.
Like this?
Thanks for liking this story! We have added it to a list of your favorite stories.
Democratic State Sen. Wendy Davis' filibuster at the Texas State House got a lot of attention. She was on the Sunday morning shows. Her unflattering high school yearbook photo surfaced. And she's been mentioned as a potential candidate for the Texas governor's race.
But Kathleen Parker writes in The Washington Post that the media is forgetting what the filibuster was really about: abortion:
No adult needs a primer on the politics of abortion. Part of what makes this issue so difficult is that both sides are, in principle, correct. Anti-abortion folks see it as a human rights issue. Given that human life is a continuum that begins at conception, there can be no compromise.
Pro-abortion rights folks see any limitation on abortion as an infringement on a woman’s right to control her own body. In their view, the baby isn’t a baby with human rights until it leaves the mother’s body, thereby becoming autonomous if lacking in self-sufficiency.
Read all of Parker's argument about how the media should be fostering a serious discussion about abortion rather than "gushing like breathless red-carpet commentators" over Davis' rosy footwear.
Turn Up Your Support
MPR News helps you turn down the noise and build shared understanding. Turn up your support for this public resource and keep trusted journalism accessible to all.