Stay Curious. Stay Connected.
MailNewsletters♡Donate Now
Sign up
*Password must be at least 8 characters and contain one uppercase letter, one lowercase letter, one number and one symbol.
Already have an account?
By submitting, you consent that you are at least 18 years of age and to receive information about MPR's or APMG entities' programs and offerings. The personally identifying information you provide will not be sold, shared, or used for purposes other than to communicate with you about MPR, APMG entities, and its sponsors. You may opt-out at any time clicking the unsubscribe link at the bottom of any email communication. View our Privacy Policy.
Sign in to your profile
Forgot Password?
New to MPR News?
Welcome back
to news
for you
Reset Password

Enter the username on file and we'll send you a code to reset your password.

Still require assistance or not sure what your User Name is?
Welcome back
to news
for you
Email Verification

A verification code has been emailed to

Still awaiting the code?
Statewide Blog
Dan Kraker

Livestock killings down, but too soon to link to wolf hunt

Go Deeper.

Create an account or log in to save stories.

Log inCreate a free Account

Like this?

Thanks for liking this story! We have added it to a list of your favorite stories.

Show me!

Livestock producers in northern Minnesota were some of the loudest advocates for a wolf hunt when the gray wolf came off the endangered species list last year. They said in the years leading up the the delisting they were seeing more of their cattle killed by the predator. When they could prove their animals were killed  by wolves, the government would pay to trap and kill the wolves in the area.

As Minnesota heads into  its second regulated wolf  hunt (set to begin Nov. 9),  the number of verified complaints has dropped by almost half. And because a single complaint can lead to exterminating an entire herd, the drop in wolves killed has been even more dramatic.

This year's data is through the week of Oct. 7, but historically the vast majority of depredation occurs in the summer months.

[image]

 

The DNR can't say whether the declines are a direct result of the first hunting season. "But it was certainly something we wanted to consider as an objective down the road to evaluate hunting and trapping as a management tool," said Dan Stark, the DNR's large carnivore specialist.

More than the hunting season contributes to the state's wolf population, including the availability of prey (largely white tailed deer), and the wolves' nutritional status. Stark says wolves usually fare well in severe winters, when deer are more vulnerable, and more poorly in mild winters, when deer are more difficult to catch.

That could help explain the depredation numbers. 2011 was very mild (remember those 80 degree days in March?). The following year depredation numbers spiked. 2012's winter was agonizingly long for humans. But that benefited wolves, and depredation numbers dropped significantly in 2013.

Of course the hunt could have contributed to this year's low numbers as well. The DNR plans to conduct wolf population surveys every year now (rather than every five years), so it can better study the hunting season's impacts on the wolf population in Minnesota.