U of M sponsored research awards down 7.5 %, but trend is still upward
Go Deeper.
Create an account or log in to save stories.
Like this?
Thanks for liking this story! We have added it to a list of your favorite stories.
Sponsored research funding for the University of Minnesota declined 7.5 percent last year, according to a university report that regents are scheduled to discuss today.
The $56 million drop, to $693 million, was driven in part by the phaseout of federal stimulus money. U officials say the decline was also due to the lingering effects of the recession, federal disinvestment in basic research, and sequestration.
In Fiscal Year 2013, the U got $749,000 in stimulus money, compared to a peak of $131 million in 2010, when the U reach a high of $823 million in total research funding.
But U officials stress that the overall trend since 2009 is upward. During the five years of stimulus funding -- from 2009 to 2013 -- non-stimulus money still rose 21.6 percent.
Turn Up Your Support
MPR News helps you turn down the noise and build shared understanding. Turn up your support for this public resource and keep trusted journalism accessible to all.
During that period, the U was second behind the University of Michigan in the total amount of stimulus money received by a consortium of 15 universities including the Big Ten.
Gross revenues from the commercialization of technology were down last year almost 14 percent to $39.5 million. The number of revenue-generating agreements was down 22 percent.
The revenue figure is down by a wide margin from a five-year peak of $95.2 million in 2009.
But the U posted a record 14 startup companies, just over the dozen launched the previous year.
Other areas were also up, such as invention disclosures, U.S. patent filings and new licenses.
The U slipped from eighth place to ninth among public research universities in National Science Foundation funding, according to 2012 data, which is the most recent available.
U officials say that’s because one university in the rankings, the University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill, changed how it calculated its funding totals.
Seventy percent of federal research funding came from the National institute of Health and National Science Foundation.
In the spring, the U will issue a report on how it stacks up against peer universities in various research funding measures.