Stay Curious. Stay Connected.
MailNewsletters♡Donate Now
Sign up
*Password must be at least 8 characters and contain one uppercase letter, one lowercase letter, one number and one symbol.
Already have an account?
By submitting, you consent that you are at least 18 years of age and to receive information about MPR's or APMG entities' programs and offerings. The personally identifying information you provide will not be sold, shared, or used for purposes other than to communicate with you about MPR, APMG entities, and its sponsors. You may opt-out at any time clicking the unsubscribe link at the bottom of any email communication. View our Privacy Policy.
Sign in to your profile
Forgot Password?
New to MPR News?
Welcome back
to news
for you
Reset Password

Enter the username on file and we'll send you a code to reset your password.

Still require assistance or not sure what your User Name is?
Welcome back
to news
for you
Email Verification

A verification code has been emailed to

Still awaiting the code?

Judge would add critical voice to secret courts

Go Deeper.

Create an account or log in to save stories.

Like this?

Thanks for liking this story! We have added it to a list of your favorite stories.

Copy of a FISA court order
This photograph made Thursday, June 6, 2013, shows a copy of the U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court order requiring Verizon on an "ongoing, daily basis," to give the National Security Administration (NSA) information on landline and mobile telephone calls.
ASSOCIATED PRESS

The secret courts that oversee government surveillance of Americans are intended to protect citizens' rights. But how well do they do that job?

There's no telling. The FISA courts are secret.

But critics have long pointed out that the judges who serve under the terms of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act approve the overwhelming majority of requests from the government. From that, you could infer either that the government is making only valid requests for surveillance authority or that the court is hearing only the government's side of the argument in each case.

James G. Carr, a federal judge in Ohio who served as one of the FISA judges, believes in the FISA process. But he also believes that the jurists currently serving need a more complete picture of some of the cases presented to them.

"During my six years on the court, there were several occasions when I and other judges faced issues none of us had encountered before," Carr wrote last summer in the New York Times. "A staff of experienced lawyers assists the court, but their help was not always enough given the complexity of the issues. ... Having lawyers challenge novel legal assertions in these secret proceedings would result in better judicial outcomes."

Carr argued that "Congress could ... authorize the FISA judges to appoint, from time to time, independent lawyers with security clearances to serve 'pro bono publico' — for the public's good — to challenge the government when an application for a FISA order raises new legal issues."

Carr joins The Daily Circuit to discuss the issues arising from U.S. reliance on FISA courts.