Stay Curious. Stay Connected.
MailNewsletters♡Donate Now
Sign up
*Password must be at least 8 characters and contain one uppercase letter, one lowercase letter, one number and one symbol.
Already have an account?
By submitting, you consent that you are at least 18 years of age and to receive information about MPR's or APMG entities' programs and offerings. The personally identifying information you provide will not be sold, shared, or used for purposes other than to communicate with you about MPR, APMG entities, and its sponsors. You may opt-out at any time clicking the unsubscribe link at the bottom of any email communication. View our Privacy Policy.
Sign in to your profile
Forgot Password?
New to MPR News?
Welcome back
to news
for you
Reset Password

Enter the username on file and we'll send you a code to reset your password.

Still require assistance or not sure what your User Name is?
Welcome back
to news
for you
Email Verification

A verification code has been emailed to

Still awaiting the code?
Daily Circuit Blog
Eric Ringham

Op-ed pick: Legislators get a pass on DUI charges

Go Deeper.

Create an account or log in to save stories.

Log inCreate a free Account

Like this?

Thanks for liking this story! We have added it to a list of your favorite stories.

Show me!

It’s not an op-ed, exactly, but Jon Tevlin’s column in the Sunday Star Tribune deserves attention. He took note of a Concordia University class project to correct an eye-popping wrong: When the Minnesota Legislature is in session, legislators enjoy immunity from arrest for driving drunk.

They have immunity for other infractions, too, Tevlin explains:

Currently, the Minnesota Constitution gives legislators what amounts to a “get-out-of-jail-free” card during the session, allowing them “legislative immunity” from arrest in all cases except “treason, felony and breach of the peace.”

The Concordia students have crafted a bill that would add drunken driving to the list of exceptions. Tevlin rhetorically asks, “What kind of dope would oppose that?”

“We have had legislators tell us ‘I would rather have them drive drunk than miss a vote,’ and ‘I love my card,’ ” [student Hope] Baker said, incredulously.

“I had a committee member tell me last week that he knew of someone who used their [immunity] card in a suburb two weeks before that, and justified it by saying there were not cab services in the area,” Baker added.

The students checked, and there were several cab companies serving the area.

The class has been unable to find out how often legislators have used their privilege, although it has found records of arrests made when the Legislature was not in session and its members therefore governed by the same laws that apply to everyone else.

Tevlin concludes his column with a promise to help shine a light on the class project and the reception it gets:

Stay tuned. If the students’ attempt to hold lawmakers accountable to drunken driving laws fails, we will be eager to name all those who got in the way in a future column.

(Note to law enforcement: If you know of legislators using the card during traffic stops, call or write to me.)

Tevlin’s email is jtevlin@startribune.com, and his phone number is 612-673-1702. Read the whole column here.