Stay Curious. Stay Connected.
MailNewsletters♡Donate Now
Sign up
*Password must be at least 8 characters and contain one uppercase letter, one lowercase letter, one number and one symbol.
Already have an account?
By submitting, you consent that you are at least 18 years of age and to receive information about MPR's or APMG entities' programs and offerings. The personally identifying information you provide will not be sold, shared, or used for purposes other than to communicate with you about MPR, APMG entities, and its sponsors. You may opt-out at any time clicking the unsubscribe link at the bottom of any email communication. View our Privacy Policy.
Sign in to your profile
Forgot Password?
New to MPR News?
Welcome back
to news
for you
Reset Password

Enter the username on file and we'll send you a code to reset your password.

Still require assistance or not sure what your User Name is?
Welcome back
to news
for you
Email Verification

A verification code has been emailed to

Still awaiting the code?
Environmental News
The Associated Press

Minnesota Supreme Court agrees to hear PolyMet permit appeal

PolyMet Mine
Eric Olson, right, gathers his tools on May 29, 2019, as contractor Robert Radotich uses a backhoe to dig areas so the soil stratification can be observed, which will help them engineer and design the infiltration pods for the PolyMet copper-nickel mine in Hoyt Lakes, Minn.
Anthony Souffle | Star Tribune via AP file

Go Deeper.

Create an account or log in to save stories.

Log inCreate a free Account

Like this?

Thanks for liking this story! We have added it to a list of your favorite stories.

Show me!

The Minnesota Supreme Court has agreed to hear PolyMet Mining Inc.'s appeal of a ruling that canceled three permits needed for its proposed copper-nickel mine in northeastern Minnesota.

In January, the Minnesota Court of Appeals gave environmentalists a major victory by rejecting some of the most important permits for the planned mine.

The appeals court sent the dispute back to the Department of Natural Resources for a trial-like contested case hearing before a neutral administrative law judge on the project's environmental risks.

PolyMet pointed out that the DNR has already held a 15-year-long environmental review and permitting process that included numerous chances for the public to weigh in.

Environmental groups said Wednesday they will defend the appeals court decision.

The Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy says the appeal court properly concluded that the risks of PolyMet’s proposal “are too important not to be fully evaluated by an independent judge.”

Paula Maccabee, an attorney for WaterLegacy, another group that challenged the permits, says the appeals court ruling was “sound, well-reasoned, and compelling.” Maccabee says Minnesotans “deserve a contested-case hearing process."

At issue were PolyMet’s permit to mine and its two dam safety permits. The Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa also is challenging the project.

The Supreme Court order did not set a time for oral arguments.