Political mapmaking heads to familiar spot: Minnesota’s courts

Legal wrangling has begun over new Minnesota congressional and legislative district boundaries stemming from the 2020 census with the filing of a new lawsuit.

Every 10 years the political maps are redrawn to account for population shifts, with a goal of making each type of district roughly equal in size.

Since the 1970s in Minnesota, it’s a process that has spilled into the courts and resulted in judges dictating the layout.

The lawsuit filed Friday in Carver County and a parallel action in the Minnesota Supreme Court will pull in the judicial branch again. The cases name election officials as the defendants and seeks to prevent the current maps from being used in 2022.

That’s a concern because census figures have been delayed until fall and Minnesota’s Legislature has divided party control. Minnesota could also lose a congressional seat this round.

Plaintiffs cite state demographer estimates that about half of Minnesota’s counties are believed to have shed population since 2010, with the shrinking counties predominantly or entirely in greater Minnesota. That means those areas have the most to lose as the district boundaries are readjusted. 

The case brought by retired legislative redistricting expert Peter Wattson and others says judges should insist on new maps. And it says the courts should draw them if nothing clears the Legislature by this time next year.

• Review by Senate Democrats finds more unreported luxury trips by Clarence Thomas
• Flood gates are dropped from a plan to protect the Jersey Shore’s back bays from catastrophic storms
• Minnesota House tie in peril after judge rules DFL lawmaker can’t be sworn in
• Government funding bill clears Congress and heads to President Biden, averting a shutdown