Stay Curious. Stay Connected.
MailNewsletters♡Donate Now
Sign up
*Password must be at least 8 characters and contain one uppercase letter, one lowercase letter, one number and one symbol.
Already have an account?
By submitting, you consent that you are at least 18 years of age and to receive information about MPR's or APMG entities' programs and offerings. The personally identifying information you provide will not be sold, shared, or used for purposes other than to communicate with you about MPR, APMG entities, and its sponsors. You may opt-out at any time clicking the unsubscribe link at the bottom of any email communication. View our Privacy Policy.
Sign in to your profile
Forgot Password?
New to MPR News?
Welcome back
to news
for you
Reset Password

Enter the username on file and we'll send you a code to reset your password.

Still require assistance or not sure what your User Name is?
Welcome back
to news
for you
Email Verification

A verification code has been emailed to

Still awaiting the code?
Politics and Government News
Brian Bakst
St. Paul

Talk begins about post-COVID rules for Minnesota Legislature

The Minnesota Capitol in St. Paul
The Minnesota Capitol in St. Paul, pictured on Sunday, June 27. The remote rules the Legislature used during the COVID-19 pandemic could be revised ahead of next year’s session.
Andrew Krueger | MPR News file

Go Deeper.

Create an account or log in to save stories.

Log inCreate a free Account

Like this?

Thanks for liking this story! We have added it to a list of your favorite stories.

Show me!

Minnesota lawmakers have started discussing how to recalibrate pandemic-related accommodations for members and the public heading into future sessions. 

In-person attendance by state lawmakers has been either restricted or considered optional amid COVID-19 concerns. Now that the Legislature is on its first extended break since early 2020, legislators are reassessing what remote activities should remain.

Senate Majority Leader Paul Gazelka, R-East Gull Lake, invited the input Wednesday toward the tail end of a Rules Committee hearing.

“What do we do in this new era where we can use Zoom, how we managed through COVID?” Gazelka asked. “What do we want to keep from what we’ve been doing the last year?”

He said he wants as much interaction among lawmakers as possible but left the door open to other options. 

Sen. Warren Limmer, R-Maple Grove, said there is value in face-to-face contact for legislators.

“In the last 10 years, I think we as caucus members have come to the Senate kind of as two warring camps ready to do battle in a public arena,” Limmer said. “And quite honestly, a little more relation building would be a good thing.”

The House built a secured remote voting system for the 2021 session and allowed members to speak via video link or by phone during floor debates. The Senate allowed only members who were in person to speak on bills and had those not at the Capitol relay their votes through leadership.

Limmer and others said they support a continued hybrid setup when it comes to public testimony. Senate Minority Leader Susan Kent, DFL-Woodbury, said those kinds of remote options should stay even if physical attendance by members returns to normal.

“To ask some of our stakeholders like teachers and health care providers to leave their important work for a full day to drive down here and testify for two minutes and then drive back, that may not be in peoples’ best interest,” Kent said. 

Lawmakers intend to further examine the rules this fall, but probably won’t arrive at a decision until after an expected September special session. The 2022 regular session begins in late January.