Stay Curious. Stay Connected.
MailNewsletters♡Donate Now
Sign up
*Password must be at least 8 characters and contain one uppercase letter, one lowercase letter, one number and one symbol.
Already have an account?
By submitting, you consent that you are at least 18 years of age and to receive information about MPR's or APMG entities' programs and offerings. The personally identifying information you provide will not be sold, shared, or used for purposes other than to communicate with you about MPR, APMG entities, and its sponsors. You may opt-out at any time clicking the unsubscribe link at the bottom of any email communication. View our Privacy Policy.
Sign in to your profile
Forgot Password?
New to MPR News?
Welcome back
to news
for you
Reset Password

Enter the username on file and we'll send you a code to reset your password.

Still require assistance or not sure what your User Name is?
Welcome back
to news
for you
Email Verification

A verification code has been emailed to

Still awaiting the code?
Twin Cities
Ava Ewald

Minneapolis sued over Upper Harbor Terminal project

The Minneapolis skyline is seen beyond an industrial site.
The Minneapolis skyline is seen beyond the southern half of the Upper Harbor Terminal industrial site in north Minneapolis.
Evan Frost | MPR News 2019

Go Deeper.

Create an account or log in to save stories.

Like this?

Thanks for liking this story! We have added it to a list of your favorite stories.

A group of Minneapolis residents filed a lawsuit over the city’s plans to develop the Upper Harbor Terminal on the Mississippi River, north of downtown.

The lawsuit alleges that the city failed to properly study the plan’s environmental impact and calls for the project to be halted.

“We didn’t want to take this step,” said Community Members for Environmental Justice organizer Roxxanne O’Brien, who lives in north Minneapolis. “We told them they didn’t adequately study the environmental impact of this proposal on our community, but they pushed it through anyway.”

North Minneapolis is a “Green Zone,” a status given by the city as a reflection of their commitment to improve environmental conditions there.

“Robust environmental analysis is particularly critical given North Minneapolis’ designation as one of the City’s Green Zones due to the disproportionate amount of toxic development that has been concentrated in the area over the years,” said CMEJ in a press release Thursday.

The city gave exclusive rights to United Properties, First Avenue and Thor Construction to develop the 48-acre riverfront property in 2017. Minneapolis, along with these organizations and an advisory committee of north Minneapolis residents, began the planning process in 2019. The plan includes housing, a 20-acre park, and an outdoor music venue managed by First Avenue.

When the first phase of the plan was announced in 2019, it was met with mixed feelings by the public. Some criticized the city’s decision to sell the land to private companies. Some north Minneapolis residents also felt left out of the decision overall.

The Minneapolis City Council approved the plan early this month, signaling the start of the construction and development phase.

The Minneapolis City Attorney’s office has yet to comment on the lawsuit.