Stay Curious. Stay Connected.
MailNewsletters♡Donate Now
Sign up
*Password must be at least 8 characters and contain one uppercase letter, one lowercase letter, one number and one symbol.
Already have an account?
By submitting, you consent that you are at least 18 years of age and to receive information about MPR's or APMG entities' programs and offerings. The personally identifying information you provide will not be sold, shared, or used for purposes other than to communicate with you about MPR, APMG entities, and its sponsors. You may opt-out at any time clicking the unsubscribe link at the bottom of any email communication. View our Privacy Policy.
Sign in to your profile
Forgot Password?
New to MPR News?
Welcome back
to news
for you
Reset Password

Enter the username on file and we'll send you a code to reset your password.

Still require assistance or not sure what your User Name is?
Welcome back
to news
for you
Email Verification

A verification code has been emailed to

Still awaiting the code?
Fargo, N.D. (AP)

Corps' analysis indicates need for flood project

Go Deeper.

Create an account or log in to save stories.

Log inCreate a free Account

Like this?

Thanks for liking this story! We have added it to a list of your favorite stories.

Show me!

North Dakota's congressional delegation says new information from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers indicates the Fargo-Moorhead area would suffer greater damages from flooding than previously thought.

The lawmakers say that raises the case for federal funding for a flood-protection project.

The corps is studying proposed flood diversions on both the North Dakota and Minnesota sides of the Red River.

The North Dakota delegation says the corps' latest analysis shows greater benefits from a diversion channel on the Minnesota side carrying 35,000 cubic feet of water per second. A previous analysis had suggested a smaller channel carrying 22,000 cubic feet per second would be best.

(Copyright 2010 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)