Stay Curious. Stay Connected.
MailNewsletters♡Donate Now
Sign up
*Password must be at least 8 characters and contain one uppercase letter, one lowercase letter, one number and one symbol.
Already have an account?
By submitting, you consent that you are at least 18 years of age and to receive information about MPR's or APMG entities' programs and offerings. The personally identifying information you provide will not be sold, shared, or used for purposes other than to communicate with you about MPR, APMG entities, and its sponsors. You may opt-out at any time clicking the unsubscribe link at the bottom of any email communication. View our Privacy Policy.
Sign in to your profile
Forgot Password?
New to MPR News?
Welcome back
to news
for you
Reset Password

Enter the username on file and we'll send you a code to reset your password.

Still require assistance or not sure what your User Name is?
Welcome back
to news
for you
Email Verification

A verification code has been emailed to

Still awaiting the code?
Curtis Gilbert
St. Paul, Minn.

Light rail re-route proposal unsafe, freight hauler says

Go Deeper.

Create an account or log in to save stories.

Log inCreate a free Account

Like this?

Thanks for liking this story! We have added it to a list of your favorite stories.

Show me!

Strongly-worded statements from a railroad and a coalition of metro counties are creating new challenges for the proposed Southwest light rail line.

Twin Cities & Western railroad company has rejected a proposal to re-route its trains through St. Louis Park.

It a statement Thursday, the railroad called the re-route plan unsafe, inefficient and "detrimental" to its operations.

The railroad currently runs freight trains through the scenic Kenilworth corridor of Minneapolis along part of the light rail route, which will connect downtown Minneapolis and Eden Prairie.

Minneapolis has been pushing to move the freight trains, but St. Louis Park has said it doesn't want them either.

The Counties Transit Improvement Board has now given the cities until the end of June to settle their differences and sign off on the project. If the cities fail to meet that deadline, the five counties on the board have threatened to revoke the more than $400 million they've pledged to the project.

The Metropolitan Council is scheduled to vote on the issue in April.