Stay Curious. Stay Connected.
MailNewsletters♡Donate Now
Sign up
*Password must be at least 8 characters and contain one uppercase letter, one lowercase letter, one number and one symbol.
Already have an account?
By submitting, you consent that you are at least 18 years of age and to receive information about MPR's or APMG entities' programs and offerings. The personally identifying information you provide will not be sold, shared, or used for purposes other than to communicate with you about MPR, APMG entities, and its sponsors. You may opt-out at any time clicking the unsubscribe link at the bottom of any email communication. View our Privacy Policy.
Sign in to your profile
Forgot Password?
New to MPR News?
Welcome back
to news
for you
Reset Password

Enter the username on file and we'll send you a code to reset your password.

Still require assistance or not sure what your User Name is?
Welcome back
to news
for you
Email Verification

A verification code has been emailed to

Still awaiting the code?
Dan Kraker
Duluth, Minn.

Controversial bear researcher's attorney says no permit needed

Rogers feeds June by hand
Wildlife Research Institute biologist Lynn Rogers hand feeds June, a 300-plus-pound pregnant black bear, on Thursday, Aug. 30, 2012 in the woods near Ely, Minn.
Derek Montgomery / For MPR News, file

Go Deeper.

Create an account or log in to save stories.

Log inCreate a free Account

Like this?

Thanks for liking this story! We have added it to a list of your favorite stories.

Show me!

An administrative hearing on the research methods of controversial black bear researcher Lynn Rogers will continue this week.

Last year the state Department of Natural Resources did not renew Rogers' research permit to place tracking collars on bears near Ely and web cams in their dens. Agency officials argue that, by feeding bears out of his hand, Rogers created a public safety hazard.

After Rogers challenged that decision in court, the two sides agreed to a hearing before an administrative law judge.

Rogers' attorney argued that since he doesn't possess or control the bears he studies, and since it is not illegal to feed bears in Minnesota, Rogers should not be required to obtain a DNR permit.

Chief Administrative Law Judge Tammy Pust disagreed. On Tuesday, Pust denied Rogers' request for a verdict against the department, ruling that evidence suggests Rogers does exert some control over the bears.

Rogers will present his side this week. After the judge makes her recommendation, a DNR employee not associated with the dispute will make the agency's final decision.