Frigid temperatures this weekend prompt cold weather advisories

MPR News helps you turn down the noise and build shared understanding. Turn up your support for this public resource and keep trusted journalism accessible to all. 

Turn Up Your Support

After a judge struck down ballot language Tuesday aiming to replace the Minneapolis Police Department with a new agency, the City Council passed new language for the proposed charter amendment on a 12-1 vote. 

The judge said the previous wording was misleading and unworkable. 

“The court finds that the current ballot language is vague, ambiguous and incapable of implementation, and is insufficient to identify the amendment clearly," Hennepin County District Judge Jamie Anderson wrote. "It is unreasonable and misleading.”

 just ahead of a looming deadline for ballots to go to the printer. The judge wrote that the proposal was likely to create chaos if it took effect as intended just one month after the November city election.

The revised ballot language — with a four-sentence long explanatory note — was submitted to Hennepin County and the Secretary of State’s Office minutes before the 3 p.m. deadline. 

Yes 4 Minneapolis, the coalition behind the public safety proposal, initially planned to appeal the ruling to the Minnesota Supreme Court but ultimately decided to let the new wording stand.

“For us, it is most certainly the priority that the people of Minneapolis get to vote on the thing that 22,000 of them said they wanted to be able to vote on,” said Yes 4 Minneapolis spokesperson Minister JaNaé Bates.

Yes 4 Minneapolis also responded to the judge’s ruling 

City Attorney Jim Rowader said the Hennepin County Elections Office could change or refuse to use the revised ballot language if they feel it is "substantially similar" to the wording struck down earlier Tuesday. Hennepin County election manager Ginny Gelms said her office received the approved language from the city before the deadline and that the ballots have been sent for printing.

Mayor Jacob Frey, whose veto of the rejected wording was overridden, didn’t oppose the new language based on an earlier draft recommended last month by the city attorney’s office and city clerk. 

“Our obligation, my obligation under the law, is to provide the voters with fair and accurate language that tells the consequences of what voting yes on this charter amendment would actually do,” Frey said at a press briefing Tuesday afternoon. “The council has now abided by the judge’s order in getting to a transparent place.” 

Frey had said the previous language "failed to meet the most basic standards of transparency.”

proposal had its roots in the “defund the police” movement

 that gained steam after last summer's 

 in Minneapolis. Supporters said the ballot question would not abolish policing in Minneapolis, just remove charter requirements that they argued blocked moves toward more police accountability and racial justice. But critics, including Frey, said it left out crucial details for what policing in the city would look like going forward.

Yes 4 Minneapolis urged its supporters to stand firm and contact their council members immediately “to make sure our elected officials know we still expect to vote on fair and balanced language this fall.”

The Yes 4 Minneapolis charter amendment, explained

Suit accuses city of adding misleading language to ballot question on police

The injunction to keep the language off the ballot was sought by former City Council member Don Samuels, his wife, Sondra, and businessman Bruce Dachis.

“This is a victory for the hundreds of thousands of Minneapolis residents who will now not be misled by vague and confusing ballot language,” Don and Sondra Samuels said in a statement Tuesday.

Their attorney, Joseph Anthony, called Anderson's ruling a “courageous and correct decision.” He said the council members who supported the language intentionally kept it vague in hopes that more people would vote for it.

“Basically what the judge said was, you've got to make it clear so that people can see what they're voting on,” Anthony said.

The case was the second time this summer that the city was sued over the ballot question. The judge earlier rejected an explanatory note that city officials had sought to include on the ballot to highlight some of the proposal's effects, saying the note could have been read as either an endorsement or a warning.

The proposal has caused concerns among some centrist Democratic leaders that it could harm the party not just locally but nationwide, as Republicans use fears over public safety to try to woo back suburban swing voters. U.S. Rep. Angie Craig, U.S. Sen. Amy Klobuchar and Gov Tim Walz spoke out against the measure last month, while two prominent progressives, U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar and state Attorney General Keith Ellison, endorsed it last week.

Crime, Law and Justice

Politics and Government News

Shows

All Things Considered

NewsPartners

The murder of George Floyd

The Associated Press

Author

Brandt Williams

Matt Sepic

A judge has struck down ballot language that would replace the Minneapolis Police Department with a new agency, saying the wording was misleading and unworkable. The City Council drafted new language, which was submitted to the county minutes before the deadline.

After a judge struck down ballot language Tuesday aiming to replace the Minneapolis Police Department with a new agency, the City Council passed new language for the proposed charter amendment on a 12-1 vote.

Mpls. council revises ballot language on policing after judge's order

Go Deeper.

Like this?