Minnesota Senate passes paid family and medical leave program
Go Deeper.
Create an account or log in to save stories.
Like this?
Thanks for liking this story! We have added it to a list of your favorite stories.
Updated 5:44 p.m.
Minnesota’s Senate passed a paid family and medical plan Monday by a party line vote of 34-33, with all Democrats in favor and all Republicans opposed.
Sponsors changed the bill before the final vote to give some employers slightly more flexibility in crafting plans while still assuring workers time off during major life events.
The bill is a key priority of legislative Democrats; a version narrowly passed in the House last week. If a final measure is approved within the next few weeks, the partial wage replacement structure would take a few years to get into place. It relies on a payroll tax on employers and employees, similar to other paycheck withholdings.
The Senate bill’s author, DFLer Alice Mann of Edina, said providing broader family and medical leave to Minnesota workers could improve maternal and child health outcomes, as well as financial security. And it could encourage workers to stay in their jobs longer, she said.
Turn Up Your Support
MPR News helps you turn down the noise and build shared understanding. Turn up your support for this public resource and keep trusted journalism accessible to all.
“This program is going to even the playing field,” Mann said. “It will keep people out of poverty and most importantly, this program is built on a foundation that we are all worthy, that all of our experiences and life trajectories are equally important.”
Early in Monday’s debate, Mann successfully amended her bill to more clearly define a benefit year — that matters because allowable weeks off would be capped annually — and give companies with out-of-state operations comfort that only workers who spend most of their time in Minnesota would be covered. It also would provide money to help offset costs of certain health care workers already facing workforce recruiting challenges.
Ahead of the debate, Sen. Julia Coleman, R-Waconia, urged DFLers to adopt a program that would allow the creation of a paid family and medical leave insurance policy. And it would fund credits for small businesses that offered paid leave benefits to their employees.
“While we believe expanding access to paid family leave, is the right thing to do, we don't believe that the Democrats one-size-fits-all mandate, a new tax, billions in spending and a massive new government bureaucracy that will crush our small businesses, hurt our teacher shortage issue and make life for Minnesota even tougher is the right way to go about it,” she said.
The Senate rejected Coleman’s plan by a party line 33-34 vote.
Some small business owners and school leaders on Monday said the plan would pose a significant burden to their bottom line and could create problems in finding temporary workers.
“I'm concerned on how this is going to affect my bottom line,” said Jodi Theis, owner of Paws Inn Pet Essentials in Waconia, Minn. “How am I going to be able to continue staffing as it's a struggle already?”
Stillwater area schools superintendent Mike Funk said he supported providing paid family and medical leave for workers, but the payroll tax that would fund it and unknown expenses for finding replacement workers would pose a significant expense to school districts. Funk said the district expected to pay $240,000 a year for the program.
“With over 1,000 employees, the financial impact of this bill could be very significant, and leave us less resources to compensate our employees fairly in other areas,” Funk said. “The opportunity cost to our students from this mandate could be significant.”
Senate Republicans argued the program would be hard on both business owners and on employees who don’t take leave.
“This type of program does nothing but transfer the workload to your most loyal employees, those that are going to be there pretty much no matter what,” said Sen. Paul Utke, R-Park Rapids.
Supporters, including faith leaders, labor unions, health care providers and people who lacked paid leave through their employers rallied at the Capitol Monday ahead of the debate. And they said many Minnesotans lack access to paid leave benefits through their work but could benefit from a statewide program.
Samie Burnett was working at a school when her infant daughter got sick and had to go to the hospital two years ago. Burnett said she had to choose between taking unpaid time off to be with her daughter or running a virtual class from her cell phone.
“We had to stay an extra day. So we got released Tuesday instead of Monday, I literally clocked into work from my phone, and was doing classes from my phone while in the hospital waiting to be released. And that's not okay,” Burnett said.
During the Senate debate, Sen. Heather Gustafson, DFL-Vadnais Heights, said the program would offer financial security to workers.
“This makes sure they can take that time off that they need during their most vulnerable moments and return to their job as soon as they can,” Gustafson said. “And by the way, if I have a baby or emergency surgery it doesn't mean I'm a disloyal employee – it means I had emergency surgery or a baby.”
Minnesota would join 12 other states with paid family and medical leave programs if the Legislature approves the bill and the governor signs it into law.
And Gov. Tim Walz said he will sign it.
“Paid family and medical leave will make it a whole lot easier to raise a child or care for a relative without losing a paycheck,” Walz said on Twitter after the Senate vote. “When the bill reaches my desk, I’m ready to sign it into law – and show the country what it takes to be a state that works for everyone.”
