Stay Curious. Stay Connected.
MailNewsletters♡Donate Now
Sign up
*Password must be at least 8 characters and contain one uppercase letter, one lowercase letter, one number and one symbol.
Already have an account?
By submitting, you consent that you are at least 18 years of age and to receive information about MPR's or APMG entities' programs and offerings. The personally identifying information you provide will not be sold, shared, or used for purposes other than to communicate with you about MPR, APMG entities, and its sponsors. You may opt-out at any time clicking the unsubscribe link at the bottom of any email communication. View our Privacy Policy.
Sign in to your profile
Forgot Password?
New to MPR News?
Welcome back
to news
for you
Reset Password

Enter the username on file and we'll send you a code to reset your password.

Still require assistance or not sure what your User Name is?
Welcome back
to news
for you
Email Verification

A verification code has been emailed to

Still awaiting the code?
Politics and Government News
Ellie Roth

Rochester man’s threats of violence conviction overturned by Minnesota appeals court

Go Deeper.

Create an account or log in to save stories.

Like this?

Thanks for liking this story! We have added it to a list of your favorite stories.

The Minnesota Court of Appeals overturned a Rochester man’s threats of violence conviction on Monday, ruling that his statements on social media platforms promising to kill members of the deep state qualify as political speech.

In the spring of 2022, Rochester resident Kyle Ketterling posted on Gettr, a conservative-oriented social media site, threatening to kill various groups of people. 

Police reviewed the posts and were concerned that Ketterling would carry out his threats in the city of Rochester. He was arrested that May. 

The Court of Appeals limited the review to one of three convictions in the district court ruling. It involved a charge that he threatened to kill unspecified members of the deep state. 

The three-judge panel decided threats that led to charges under the count at issue were not specific enough to merit prosecution under the threats-of-violence law. In reversing the conviction, the court ruled that Ketterling’s post was not a true threat because whether a deep state exists is a matter of political opinion. 

“The true threats exception to free speech protection serves a narrow purpose: to protect individuals, and groups of individuals, from the fear — and possibility — of violence,” said Judge Lucinda Jesson, who wrote the opinion joined by two other judges. “It is unclear what individuals, or group of individuals, if any, would fear violence as a result of this particular politically laden threat.”

The three-judge panel also determined that no specific threat was lodged.

 “While disturbing, it is protected by the First Amendment,” Judge Jesson wrote.

The case was sent back to district court for more proceedings. An appeal to the Minnesota Supreme Court is possible.